| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: enable_joinremoval |
| Date: | 2010-03-29 20:11:35 |
| Message-ID: | 1269893495.3684.4310.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:55 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
> >>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
> >>> checking that.
> >>
> >> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output... Seems simple enough.
>
> > That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
> > answer.
>
> Who complained about that exactly? It seems like a perfectly
> appropriate answer to me.
I'm relaying feedback from others not on this list. People expect me to
do this. I shouldn't need to name them for us to accept the feedback,
nor should there be doubt that I relay this accurately (why else would I
raise the subject?!?). If it comes from me, I say so.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-29 20:12:13 | Re: Proposal: Add JSON support |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-29 20:11:03 | Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1 |