From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] PL instrumentation plugin and Rendezvous variable support - version 2 |
Date: | 2006-08-15 19:08:09 |
Message-ID: | 19148.1155668889@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com" <korryd(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> This is an updated version of the PL instrumentation plugin patch that I
> submitted on July-28. The new version re-implements the plugin loader
> code to use "rendezvous variables" as suggested by Tom Lane (thanks Tom,
> very elegant design).
Applied with a few small changes --- I renamed the GUC variables after a
suggestion by Simon Riggs, and fixed things so that
backend_load_libraries could actually do something useful (you had it as
PGC_POSTMASTER, making it effectively no more flexible than the existing
preload_libraries list).
The only change that will directly impact your code is that I thought
it'd be better to provide plpgsql_exec_error_callback and
exec_assign_expr as separate fields instead of arguments to func_setup,
viz
if (*plugin_ptr)
{
(*plugin_ptr)->error_callback = plpgsql_exec_error_callback;
(*plugin_ptr)->assign_expr = exec_assign_expr;
if ((*plugin_ptr)->func_setup)
((*plugin_ptr)->func_setup)(estate, func);
}
I'm not totally wedded to this if you don't like it, but my thought was
that passing these as arguments to func_setup would mean a lot of pain
anytime we wanted to change the set of function pointers provided:
every plugin would need textual changes whether it actually used these
functions or not.
> I have not implemented any support for unloading shared libraries. Once
> we've finalized the design for rendezvous variables, I'll submit a
> separate documentation patch.
I added docs for the GUC variables but didn't do more than that. I
think the code comments are probably sufficient as far as rendezvous
variables and PLpgSQL_plugin go ... did you have something else in mind?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-15 19:22:19 | Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-15 18:55:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-08-15 19:22:19 | Re: [PATCHES] Custom variable class segmentation fault |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-08-15 18:55:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Forcing current WAL file to be archived |