"Sander Steffann" <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl> writes:
> From: "Harald Fuchs" <hf0217x(at)protecting(dot)net>
>> Forget inet. Check out http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ and be happy.
> I would be happy if it would support IPv6 :-) Are there plans to make ip6r
> or something like that?
What's the point? You might as well use the regular inet type if you
need to handle ipv6.
regards, tom lane