| From: | "Sander Steffann" <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Harald Fuchs'" <hf0217x(at)protecting(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: IP addresses |
| Date: | 2007-11-21 08:47:45 |
| Message-ID: | 001b01c82c1b$2ff629e0$8fe27da0$@steffann@computel.nl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom,
> "Sander Steffann" <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl> writes:
> > From: "Harald Fuchs" <hf0217x(at)protecting(dot)net>
> >> Forget inet. Check out http://pgfoundry.org/projects/ip4r/ and be
> happy.
>
> > I would be happy if it would support IPv6 :-) Are there plans to
> > make ip6r or something like that?
>
> What's the point? You might as well use the regular inet type if you
> need to handle ipv6.
Well, the OP said to forget about inet, and I like the ip4r range type. I
hoped there was something better/nicer/shinier :-)
Thanks,
Sander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sascha Bohnenkamp | 2007-11-21 09:22:53 | Re: Primary Key |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2007-11-21 08:34:17 | Re: Normalization tools for postgres? |