Re: Built-in CTYPE provider

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Built-in CTYPE provider
Date: 2024-07-17 15:48:46
Message-ID: 1908b19c0a3a210935608635cad1b4eeb819c66f.camel@j-davis.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2024-07-11 at 05:50 -0700, Noah Misch wrote:
> > This is still marked as an open item for 17, but you've already
> > acknowledged[1] that no code changes are necessary in version 17.
>
> Later posts on the thread made that obsolete.  The next step is to
> settle the
> question at https://postgr.es/m/20240706195129.fd@rfd.leadboat.com
> If that
> conclusion entails a remedy, v17 code changes may be part of that
> remedy.

This is the first time you've mentioned a code change in version 17. If
you have something in mind, please propose it. However, this feature
followed the right policies at the time of commit, so there would need
to be a strong consensus to accept such a change.

Additionally, I started a discussion on version 18 policy that may also
resolve your concerns:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/d75d2d0d1d2bd45b2c332c47e3e0a67f0640b49c.camel@j-davis.com

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2024-07-17 15:59:39 Re: [PATCH] Refactor pqformat.{c,h} and protocol.h
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2024-07-17 15:44:47 Re: PG_TEST_EXTRA and meson