| From: | J C Lawrence <claw(at)kanga(dot)nu> |
|---|---|
| To: | patrick keshishian <patrick(at)pioneerdigital(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Charles Tassell <ctassell(at)isn(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: COMMIT after an ERROR? |
| Date: | 2001-10-13 07:07:29 |
| Message-ID: | 18880.1002956849@kanga.nu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001 19:35:30 -0700
patrick keshishian <patrick(at)pioneerdigital(dot)com> wrote:
> The only things that are not rolled back are advancing of
> sequences and such. I suspect serial types also exhibit similar
> behavior to sequences.
Ahh, that's actually critical information (which makes sense too
BTW). <thinks> Excellent. Then as long as the auto-ROLLBACK on
error is a guaranteed ANSI behaviour rather than a PGSQL thing,
everything is just perfect. Thanks.
--
J C Lawrence
---------(*) Satan, oscillate my metallic sonatas.
claw(at)kanga(dot)nu He lived as a devil, eh?
http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ Evil is a name of a foeman, as I live.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Allan Engelhardt | 2001-10-13 12:47:13 | [Off-topic, Meta-question] Problems with psql-general list |
| Previous Message | J C Lawrence | 2001-10-13 07:04:01 | Re: COMMIT after an ERROR? |