From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Failure in contrib test _int on loach |
Date: | 2019-05-02 07:37:29 |
Message-ID: | 188696f4-7ddd-e1dc-0142-dd0382f72df7@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(resending, previous attempt didn't make it to pgsql-hackers)
On 29/04/2019 16:16, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
> In previous emails, I have sent two patches with test and bugfix (see
> attached).
> After Heikki shared his concerns, I've rechecked the algorithm and
> haven't found any potential error.
> So, if other hackers are agreed with my reasoning, the suggested fix is
> sufficient and can be committed.
I still believe there is a problem with grandparent splits with this.
I'll try to construct a test case later this week, unless you manage to
create one before that.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-05-02 08:06:19 | Re: How to estimate the shared memory size required for parallel scan? |
Previous Message | John Naylor | 2019-05-02 07:09:26 | Re: Unhappy about API changes in the no-fsm-for-small-rels patch |