From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2024-11-27 16:44:25 |
Message-ID: | 1869337.1732725865@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> On 2024-Nov-27, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Would there be a default?
> There would be no default. Running with no option given would raise an
> error. The point is: you want to break scripts currently running
> --analyze-in-stages so that they can make a choice of which of these two
> modes to run. Your proposal (as I understand it) is to remove the
> --analyze-in-stages option and add two other options. My proposal is to
> keep --analyze-in-stages, but require it to have a specifier of which
> mode to run. Both achieve what you want, but I think mine achieves it
> in a cleaner way.
I do not like the idea of breaking existing upgrade scripts,
especially not by requiring them to use a parameter that older
vacuumdb versions will reject. That makes it impossible to have a
script that is version independent. I really doubt that there is any
usability improvement to be had here that's worth that.
How about causing "--analyze-in-stages" (as currently spelled) to
be a no-op? We could keep the behavior available under some other
name.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2024-11-27 16:51:04 | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-11-27 16:36:22 | Re: Allow non-superuser to cancel superuser tasks. |