Re: pg_verifybackup: TAR format backup verification

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sravan Kumar <sravanvcybage(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_verifybackup: TAR format backup verification
Date: 2024-10-01 17:32:13
Message-ID: 1865585.1727803933@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Here is an attempt at cleaning this up. I'm far from convinced that
>> it's fully correct; my local compiler (clang version 15.0.7) doesn't
>> seem fussed about conflating size_t with uint64, not even with -Wall
>> -Werror. I don't suppose you have a fussier compiler locally that you
>> can use to test this?

> Sure, I can try it on mamba's host. It's slow though ...

Yes, mamba thinks this is OK.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shayon Mukherjee 2024-10-01 18:17:19 Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX
Previous Message Nitin Jadhav 2024-10-01 16:50:06 Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats