| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CIDR/INET improvements |
| Date: | 2006-01-24 15:11:07 |
| Message-ID: | 18590.1138115467@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joachim Wieland <joe(at)mcknight(dot)de> writes:
> FWIW, I append the patch I've done a few weeks ago. It adds an inettocidr
> cast function.
I think we need to take two steps back and look at the larger picture:
the INET/CIDR situation is conceptually a mess and it's going to take
more than a localized change to clean it up.
I have some ideas about this and will try to post a proposal on -hackers
later today.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-01-24 15:38:47 | Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-24 15:05:43 | Re: Weird pg_dumpall bug? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alon Goldshuv | 2006-01-24 15:19:27 | Re: Libpq COPY optimization patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-01-24 15:02:19 | Re: Libpq COPY optimization patch |