| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sam James <sam(at)gentoo(dot)org>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Build failure with GCC 15 (defaults to -std=gnu23) |
| Date: | 2024-11-27 14:54:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1856779.1732719255@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:59 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yeah, that's a fair criticism. I don't think we've tested that code
>> path since I retired prairiedog, so who's to say that it works even
>> now? Maybe it's best to just delete that code, and if we ever find a
>> new platform with wider bool, figure out what to do at that time.
> Here's a draft patch for that.
Passes an eyeball check, but I've not really tried to test it.
I suppose the only meaningful test is likely to be letting the
buildfarm loose on it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-11-27 15:40:13 | Re: BUG #18711: Attempting a connection with a database name longer than 63 characters now fails |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-11-27 12:53:07 | Re: Function pg_get_constraintdef |