Re: Inserts and bad performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe(dot)Godfrin(at)nov(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inserts and bad performance
Date: 2021-11-24 19:31:53
Message-ID: 185058.1637782313@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Godfrin, Philippe E" <Philippe(dot)Godfrin(at)nov(dot)com> writes:
> I am inserting a large number of rows, 5,10, 15 million. The python code commits every 5000 inserts. The table has partitioned children.
> At first, when there were a low number of rows inserted, the inserts would run at a good clip - 30 - 50K inserts per second. Now, after inserting oh say 1.5 Billion rows, the insert rate has dropped to around 5000 inserts per second. I dropped the unique index , rebuilt the other indexes and no change. The instance is 16 vcpu and 64GB ram.

Can you drop the indexes and not rebuild them till after the bulk load is
done? Once the indexes exceed available RAM, insert performance is going
to fall off a cliff, except maybe for indexes that are receiving purely
sequential inserts (so that only the right end of the index gets touched).

Also see

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/populate.html

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Roy 2021-11-24 19:50:16 Re: Inserts and bad performance
Previous Message Godfrin, Philippe E 2021-11-24 19:30:01 RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Inserts and bad performance