| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
| Cc: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Domains as Subtypes |
| Date: | 2006-03-25 15:14:01 |
| Message-ID: | 18189.1143299641@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:49:00PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we've got that one actually. It's domains as PL-function output
>> types that aren't checked. Also plpgsql fails to enforce domain checks
>> on its local variables.
> So is this the complete list?
No, I don't think so. IIRC we're also missing domain checks on
parameter values in Bind messages, and there might be some other
holes too. See the archives.
I made a suggestion about closing all these holes at once by
integrating domain checking into the I/O functions for domains,
but it's not clear how to do that without a big performance hit.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2006-03-25 15:24:05 | Re: Where does the time go? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-03-25 15:10:14 | Re: Role incompatibilities |