| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
| Subject: | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
| Date: | 2009-03-09 23:45:45 |
| Message-ID: | 18020.1236642345@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Can't it be kept separately maintained release for a version or two, so
> that we will have both PostgreSQL and SE-PostgreSQL and thus have an
> easy way to compare both correctness and performance ?
Actually, KaiGai-san has been distributing a patched SEPostgres on
Fedora for awhile already (and it's been rather a pain in the neck
I fear to keep it in sync with the regular distribution). One thing
I would love to know is how many people are actually using that, but
AFAIK there's no good way to find out.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-09 23:50:34 | Re: parallel restore fixes |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-09 23:42:59 | Re: parallel restore fixes |