From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Lorenzo Thurman <lorenzo(at)thethurmans(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump fails |
Date: | 2005-04-19 06:01:48 |
Message-ID: | 17904.1113890508@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Lorenzo Thurman <lorenzo(at)thethurmans(dot)com> writes:
> I'm trying that right now. I think there may be mis-match in the build
> settings between upgrades of postgresql. The "USE" settings may be at
> fault:
> - - pg-hier : Enables recursive queries like Oracle's 'CONNECT
> BY' feature.
[ rolls eyes... ] Yup, that's Gentoo all right: throw in random patches
that have been rejected by the upstream developers. Now that I think
about it, this failure is exactly what that patch is known to cause,
because it makes an incompatible change in Query structures and hence
in on-disk view rule representation.
> I think these may have been changed since the original install.
Go back to your prior setting, or even better stop using Gentoo's
hacked-up version. I'm not sure why we even bother to answer support
requests from Gentoo users, when what they are using is not our
software but some randomly-modified variant. I wonder what other
brokennesses Gentoo may be including ...
(Just for the record: I work for Red Hat, which has a rather different
notion of the level of reliability it wants to ship. So take my opinion
with the appropriate grain of salt. But I'm a mite ticked off at the
moment --- you're not the first person to have been bitten by this,
and you likely won't be the last, and I think it's entirely because
Gentoo has such a low quality standard for the patches they ship.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rafael.Hernamperez | 2005-04-19 06:18:00 | Unsubscribe |
Previous Message | Lorenzo Thurman | 2005-04-19 05:17:32 | Re: pg_dump fails |