From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Owais Khan <owais(dot)khan(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hamid Quddus <hamid(dot)quddus(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch |
Date: | 2012-08-31 19:36:34 |
Message-ID: | 17886.1346441794@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> As a side note - I'm not sure why _USE_32BIT_TIME_T was removed in the
> first place; it was added specifically to avoid this sort of problem,
> though iirc at the time we were thinking of extensions like Slony and
> PostGIS being built with Mingw for use with the VC++ built server.
We removed it when we changed our internal time_t usage to 64 bits:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=cd004067742ee16ee63e55abfb4acbd5f09fbaab
Possibly that was just a brain fade caused by failing to think about
the distinction between pg_time_t and system time_t. However, the
code has been like that since 8.4, and nobody complained before.
I share Andrew's unease about whether this issue is fully understood.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-08-31 21:17:29 | Re: fairly useless psql compatibility warning? |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-08-31 18:27:08 | Re: patch: shared session variables |