Re: Some more information_schema issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some more information_schema issues
Date: 2003-10-17 01:38:07
Message-ID: 17868.1066354687@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> I notice that most of the references in the information_schema.sql are
>> not schema-qualfied.

> They don't need to be, because the references will be resolved when the
> views are parsed during initdb.

On second thought, you do have a point with regard to those newly-added
SQL functions. Names used within the texts of those functions need to
be fully qualified for safety.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen 2003-10-17 04:21:20 Re: Some thoughts about i/o priorities and throttling vacuum
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-17 01:34:12 Re: Some more information_schema issues