Re: Some more information_schema issues

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some more information_schema issues
Date: 2003-10-17 01:34:12
Message-ID: 17810.1066354452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> I notice that most of the references in the information_schema.sql are
> not schema-qualfied.

They don't need to be, because the references will be resolved when the
views are parsed during initdb.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-17 01:38:07 Re: Some more information_schema issues
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-17 01:30:49 Re: Some more information_schema issues