Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> In XML, empty tags such as </> are no longer allowed. In preparation
> for converting the documentation to DocBook XML, I have committed a
> patch that expands all such empty tags. There is also now a warning
> from onsgmls when empty tags are used. (There is no -werror option,
> unfortunately.)
I just want to point out that this patch has more or less entirely
destroyed any hope of cleanly back-patching documentation changes.
Should we consider applying the same transformation to the back
branches?
regards, tom lane