From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: no more SGML empty tags |
Date: | 2017-10-21 16:58:04 |
Message-ID: | 14e387fe-2c04-be40-e05a-1048d3d4588c@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 10/19/17 11:11, Tom Lane wrote:
> I just want to point out that this patch has more or less entirely
> destroyed any hope of cleanly back-patching documentation changes.
>
> Should we consider applying the same transformation to the back
> branches?
Good point. There is an additional issue to consider about
backpatching, about which I have started a separate thread. It might
depend on the outcome of that what we want to do here.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jürgen Purtz | 2017-10-22 07:30:32 | Re: backpatching documentation after conversion to XML |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-10-21 16:57:00 | backpatching documentation after conversion to XML |