From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sum aggregate calculation for single precsion real |
Date: | 2017-02-15 17:30:46 |
Message-ID: | 17282.1487179846@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think that's more or less the argument Konstantin is in fact making.
> Whether it's a good argument or a thin one is a value judgement.
> Personally, I find it somewhere in the middle: I think the way it
> works now is reasonable, and I think what he wants would have been
> reasonable as well. However, I find it hard to believe it would be
> worth changing now on backward compatibility grounds.
I agree with that conclusion. It might have been reasonable to change
it fifteen years ago when we changed the integer sum() implementations,
but I think doing so now would make more people unhappy than it would
make happy; or at least, there's little reason to think the reverse
is true.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-15 17:48:26 | Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT? |
Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-02-15 17:30:39 | Re: bytea_output vs make installcheck |