Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)
Date: 2005-12-05 04:16:25
Message-ID: 16812.1133756185@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I wrote:
> Hm. One of the main problems I found was incorrect results for
> LONGLONG_MIN (-2^63). I'm rather tempted to add a test case for
> that to the int8 regression test and see if any platforms fail ;-)

Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
for you ;-)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-12-05 04:45:53 Re: Selecting Large Object and TOAST
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-12-05 04:12:30 Re: Slow COUNT

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gavin Sherry 2005-12-05 04:43:59 Re: Upcoming PG re-releases
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-05 03:27:00 Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype)

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sergey E. Koposov 2005-12-05 04:18:48 Re: psql, tab completion additions
Previous Message Sergey E. Koposov 2005-12-05 04:12:36 Re: TODO item -- Improve psql's handling of multi-line