Re: Unicode string literals versus the world

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Date: 2009-04-14 18:55:17
Message-ID: 16694.1239735317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Well, that's fine, but that's a long way from Peter's statement that
> "I think the tendency should be to get rid of E'' usage".

Bear in mind that that's Peter's opinion; it's not necessarily shared
by anyone else. I was just responding to your assertion of the
diametrically opposed position that non-E strings are useless (which
I don't share either).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2009-04-14 18:55:47 Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-14 18:52:32 Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df