| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Adis Nezirovic <adis(at)linux(dot)org(dot)ba> |
| Cc: | Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid |
| Date: | 2006-05-23 17:36:41 |
| Message-ID: | 16627.1148405801@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Adis Nezirovic <adis(at)linux(dot)org(dot)ba> writes:
> Well, maybe you could tweak postgres startup script, add check for post
> master (either 'pgrep postmaster' or 'ps -axu | grep [p]ostmaster'), and
> delete pid file on negative results.
This is exactly what you should NOT do.
A start script that thinks it is smarter than the postmaster is almost
certainly wrong. It is certainly dangerous, too, because auto-deleting
that pidfile destroys the interlock against having two postmasters
running in the same data directory (which WILL corrupt your data,
quickly and irretrievably). All it takes to cause a problem is to
use the start script to start a postmaster, forgetting that you already
have one running ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2006-05-23 17:48:59 | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-23 17:17:20 | Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition |