Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)skype(dot)net>, Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, April Lorenzen <outboundindex(at)gmail(dot)com>, postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: error-free disabling of individual child partition
Date: 2006-05-23 17:17:20
Message-ID: 16435.1148404640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> - ADD/DROP are opposites; you can use the other one to undo an action
> taken in haste, error etc

It's not going to be that easy. What exactly will happen to the child
table's attislocal/attinhcount settings, and why, during ADD or DROP?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-23 17:36:41 Re: file-locking and postmaster.pid
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-05-23 17:04:10 Re: Performance Issues