From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jacobo Sánchez López <jsanchez(at)denodo(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-odbc(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ssh tunneling |
Date: | 2024-01-24 16:39:45 |
Message-ID: | 163399.1706114385@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
=?UTF-8?Q?Jacobo_S=C3=A1nchez_L=C3=B3pez?= <jsanchez(at)denodo(dot)com> writes:
> Maybe the original message is about SSH proxy instead of tunneling?
> The PostgreSQL protocol makes a SSH upgrade instead of starting the
> communication with SSH handshake and that is a problem when using some
> SSH proxies/load balancers which are nowadays common in cloud
> environments. I also wish there was a way to connect directly to a SSH
> socket but that is not about the driver but how PostgreSQL communication
> protocol I guess.
FYI, there's some work going on to make it possible to begin the
connection with an SSL handshake:
If you'd like to see that move along, review and especially
testing of the proposed patch would help make it happen.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jacobo Sánchez López | 2024-01-24 16:55:08 | Re: ssh tunneling |
Previous Message | Jacobo Sánchez López | 2024-01-24 08:39:37 | Re: ssh tunneling |