Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-17 02:32:49
Message-ID: 16325.1287282769@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The intent here is to execute some code from the file directly inside
> the server.

> Eh, I realize now that the right way to go about this is to use SPI.

Yeah, that would be one way to go about it. But IMO postgres.c should
be solely concerned with interactions with the client.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-10-17 03:09:51 Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-17 02:32:25 Re: How to determine failed connection attempt due to invalid authorization (libpq)?