Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-17 03:09:51
Message-ID: 1287284972-sup-7649@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of sáb oct 16 23:32:49 -0300 2010:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > The intent here is to execute some code from the file directly inside
> > the server.
>
> > Eh, I realize now that the right way to go about this is to use SPI.
>
> Yeah, that would be one way to go about it. But IMO postgres.c should
> be solely concerned with interactions with the client.

Duly noted.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-10-17 03:15:07 Re: Review: Fix snapshot taking inconsistencies
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-17 02:32:49 Re: Extensions, this time with a patch