From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |
Date: | 2010-01-26 07:14:13 |
Message-ID: | 162867791001252314t19badd31yee443e2bd38cd61@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/25 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 2:27 PM, David E. Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 2:09 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> xmlagg -> concatenates values to form xml datum
>>> array_agg -> concatenates values to form array datum
>>> ??? -> concatenates values to form string datum
>>
>> concat_agg().
>
> I like that one...
>
why is concat_agg better than listagg ?
Pavel
> ...Robert
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Takahiro Itagaki | 2010-01-26 07:16:10 | Re: Syntax supplements for SET options |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-01-26 07:07:35 | Re: [HACKERS] problem with CVS on pgfoundry |