Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause

2009/11/17 Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > 2009/11/17 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>>
>> >> This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
>> >> the CommitFest...
>> >>
>> >
>> > These patches are for next commitfest. What I know, the current
>> > commitfest is closed for new patches. Is it ok?
>>
>> Until this moment I was unconvinced of the need for a strict rule that
>> patches from regular submitters who don't suspend patch development
>> to contribute to the commitfest reviews should be ignored.
>
> I agree they should be ignored until the NEXT commitfest. I do not agree
> that they should be dropped into a bucket.

I never sent these (last two) patches to THIS commitfest. Is it clean?
I am maybe crazy, but I know when commitfest starting. Have I next
month be quite? First patch I resent, because patch was broken. But
this patch was sent to 2009-11-04. Really, I don't would to push my
patches to this commitfest.

Pavel

>
> Joshua D. Drake
>
>
>>
>> -Kevin
>>
>
>
> --
> PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
> Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
> Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
> If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
>
>