| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause |
| Date: | 2009-11-17 20:58:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1258491506.9989.65.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > 2009/11/17 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>
> >> This is now the fourth patch you've submitted since the start of
> >> the CommitFest...
> >>
> >
> > These patches are for next commitfest. What I know, the current
> > commitfest is closed for new patches. Is it ok?
>
> Until this moment I was unconvinced of the need for a strict rule that
> patches from regular submitters who don't suspend patch development
> to contribute to the commitfest reviews should be ignored.
I agree they should be ignored until the NEXT commitfest. I do not agree
that they should be dropped into a bucket.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> -Kevin
>
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
If the world pushes look it in the eye and GRR. Then push back harder. - Salamander
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-11-17 21:07:31 | Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-11-17 20:52:17 | Re: plpgsql: open for execute - add USING clause |