From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks |
Date: | 2011-10-03 15:28:45 |
Message-ID: | 15991.1317655725@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> I think that new versions of patch can handle unified diffs without a
>>> problem, but older versions choke on them. My Mac has 2.5.8 and
>>> handles unidiffs no problem.
>> Even containing git headers?
> Yeah, it just skips right over them. I've never had even a minor
> problem on that account, which is why I was surprised to see it giving
> you so much trouble.
I haven't observed any such problems even with the rather ancient copy
of GNU patch on my HPUX box (seems to be 2.5.4, released in 1999).
I vaguely recall having had to replace the even older vendor-supplied
patch because that one didn't do unidiffs ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-10-03 15:31:15 | Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-03 15:27:49 | Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1 |