Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks
Date: 2011-10-03 15:31:15
Message-ID: 1317655823-sup-1094@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of lun oct 03 11:54:36 -0300 2011:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I think that new versions of patch can handle unified diffs without a
> > problem, but older versions choke on them. My Mac has 2.5.8 and
> > handles unidiffs no problem.
>
> Even containing git headers?

I remember redirecting whole emails to "patch", and it worked just fine.
And this wasn't recently.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-03 15:34:22 Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-10-03 15:28:45 Re: [v9.2] DROP statement reworks