| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres idea list |
| Date: | 2002-06-26 13:10:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1595.1025097016@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It also occurs to me that discussing this on -hackers, which is a
>> technically focused list, is itself somewhat wrongheaded. The best
>> list we have for it at the moment is -general, but I wonder whether we
>> shouldn't create a list centered around project promotion and outreach
>> concerns.
> You mean a list like ... oh, I don't know ...
> pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org? :)
You know, I seemed to remember that we had such a list, but I looked at
http://archives.postgresql.org/
and saw no archive for it, so I figured we didn't.
If you're about to go out and create it, may I suggest that the name
-advocacy might not be the best thing? -advocacy lists seem (to me
anyway) to be more often flamebait arenas than useful discussion areas.
Perhaps pgsql-promotion would be a good name that'd avoid the aura of
flamewars. Or maybe that's just my own perception not anyone else's.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Justin Clift | 2002-06-26 14:39:09 | Re: Postgres idea list |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-06-26 01:58:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres idea list |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-06-26 13:21:59 | Re: Buffer Management |
| Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-06-26 13:09:45 | Re: TPC-C Benchmarks |