From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Small patch to fix an O(N^2) problem in foreign keys |
Date: | 2015-09-08 12:49:44 |
Message-ID: | 1579634535.2113804.1441716584493.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info> wrote:
> The problem is a cache introduced in commit 45ba4247 that improves
That's a bit off; 45ba424f seems to be what you mean.
> foreign key lookups during bulk updates when the FK value does not
> change. When restoring a schema dump from a database with many (say
> 100,000) foreign keys, this cache is growing very big and every ALTER
> TABLE command is causing a InvalidateConstraintCacheCallBack(), which
> does a sequential hash table scan.
>
> The patch uses a heuristic method of detecting when the hash table
> should be destroyed and recreated. InvalidateConstraintCacheCallBack()
> adds the current size of the hash table to a counter. When that sum
> reaches 1,000,000, the hash table is flushed. This improves the schema
> restore of a database with 100,000 foreign keys by factor 3.
>
> According to my tests the patch does not interfere with the bulk
> updates, the original feature was supposed to improve.
In the real-world customer case that caused you to look into this,
I thought 45ba424f drove schema-only restore time from 2 hours to
about 25 hours, and that this patch takes it back down to 2 hours.
Am I remembering right? And this came about because it added
20-some hours to a pg_upgrade run?
If there are no objections, I will push this as a bug fix back to
9.3, where the performance regression was introduced.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajeev rastogi | 2015-09-08 12:54:50 | Memory Context Info dump |
Previous Message | Kouhei Kaigai | 2015-09-08 12:28:18 | Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed |