From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt |
Date: | 2023-04-04 17:55:17 |
Message-ID: | 1577394.1680630917@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> út 4. 4. 2023 v 18:42 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
>> Basically, I want to reject this on the grounds that it's not
>> useful enough to justify the overhead of marking the "role" GUC
>> as GUC_REPORT. The problems with it not going to work properly
>> with old servers are an additional reason not to like it.
> If I understand to next comment correctly, the overhead should not be too
> big
Yeah, but how big is the use-case? The reason I'm skeptical is that
half the time what you're going to get is "none":
$ psql
psql (16devel)
Type "help" for help.
regression=# show role;
role
------
none
(1 row)
That's required by SQL spec I believe, but that doesn't make it useful
data to keep in one's prompt.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gregory Stark (as CFM) | 2023-04-04 18:03:45 | Re: Remove dead macro exec_subplan_get_plan |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2023-04-04 17:53:38 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |