From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Cindy <ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: question about upper limit on TEXT size |
Date: | 2002-08-13 21:48:42 |
Message-ID: | 1575.1029275322@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Cindy <ctmoore(at)uci(dot)edu> writes:
> 7.2, on Solaris:
>>> on this column? Could we see the output of
>>> select * from pg_class where relname = 'searches';
> relname | reltype | relowner | relam | relpages | reltuples | rellongrelid | r
> elhasindex | relisshared | relkind | relnatts | relchecks | reltriggers | reluke
> ys | relfkeys | relrefs | relhaspkey | relhasrules | relacl
Um, well, I wasn't expecting to see the answer in the column headers...
but if that's the schema of pg_class then you are *not* talking to a 7.2
server. It's evidently 7.0.something. Try "select version()" to
find out for sure. But in any case, you need a server update ---
pre-7.1 Postgres didn't have support for rows wider than 8K.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-08-13 22:19:54 | Press reporter looking for large installs |
Previous Message | Cindy | 2002-08-13 21:26:46 | Re: question about upper limit on TEXT size |