| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries. |
| Date: | 2012-09-14 16:28:05 |
| Message-ID: | 15739.1347640085@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> writes:
> Does this mean we need to wrap new tarballs soon, because of the data loss
> bug?
I'll defer to Robert on whether this bug is serious enough to merit a
near-term release on its own. But historically, we've wanted to push
out a .1 update two or three weeks after a .0 release, to mop up
whatever new bugs are nasty enough for people to trip over right away.
Maybe we should be thinking in terms of a set of releases around the
end of September.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-09-14 17:17:27 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-14 16:09:36 | Re: pgsql: Back-patch fix and test case for bug #7516. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-09-14 17:17:27 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries. |
| Previous Message | Rural Hunter | 2012-09-14 15:53:38 | Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed |