Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: retry shm attach for windows (WAS: Re: OK, so culicidae is *still* broken)
Date: 2017-05-25 14:31:40
Message-ID: 15732.1495722700@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, I also share this opinion, the shm attach failures are due to
> randomization behavior, so sleep won't help much. So, I will change
> the patch to use 100 retries unless people have other opinions.

Sounds about right to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-05-25 14:39:13 Re: Fix performance of generic atomics
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-05-25 14:18:21 Re: No parameter values checking while creating Alter subscription...Connection