From: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | stable(at)freebsd(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | was there a change in FreeBSD SHM implementation from 4.4 to 4.6? (postgres trouble) |
Date: | 2002-07-10 18:15:09 |
Message-ID: | 15660.31149.224797.969563@onceler.kciLink.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I have a dual cpu box with 2GB RAM dedicated to running Postgres.
Last week, I upgraded FreeBSD from 4.4-STABLE to 4.6-RELEASE-p1. When
I went to restart postgres, it complained that it could not allocate
the shared memory segment. I'm running Postgres 7.2.1.
For those familiar with postgres, I was using shared_buffers=100000
with 4.4, but had to back that down to 32000 for 4.6. This is
obviously impacting performance...
The kern.ipc.* settings have not changed. In my /etc/sysctl.conf
file, I set
kern.ipc.shmmax=268435456
kern.ipc.shmall=65535
kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1
With FreeBSD 4.6, I even upped the shmmax to 1073741824 to no avail.
I also set this in the kernel (so as to eliminate any issues with
setting it at boot time).
However, it does produce a most peculiar error message when running
postgres:
-- cut here --
IpcMemoryCreate: shmget(key=5432001, size=665346048, 03600) failed: Cannot allocate memory
This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared
memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space.
To reduce the request size (currently 665346048 bytes), reduce
PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 80000) and/or
its max_connections parameter (currently 48).
-- cut here --
Now, by my arithmetic, 665346048 is certainly less than 1073741824 by
quite a bit.
I did not recompile postgres after the FreeBSD upgrade.
Has something changed from 4.4-STABLE that would cause such a failure?
The funny thing is that it worked just fine with FBSD 4.4 and the
lower setting of shmmax (even with 100000 shared_buffers), so
something is making postgres try to allocate a larger hunk of memory.
I just don't know what.
Any advice would be appreciated.
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D. Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera(at)kciLink(dot)com Rockville, MD +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera http://www.khera.org/~vivek/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | terry | 2002-07-10 18:17:19 | Re: Linux max on shared buffers? |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2002-07-10 17:52:33 | Re: I am being interviewed by OReilly |