From: | Muhammad(dot)Altaf at au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com (Altaf, Muhammad) |
---|---|
To: | |
Subject: | [Pljava-dev] Explicit transaction control |
Date: | 2013-11-29 00:21:57 |
Message-ID: | 15631647725E1342BFD5662917E1063AB45FC5@sydexchtmp4.au.fjanz.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pljava-dev |
Hi,
Currently connection.commit/rollback in pljava throw
FeatureNotSupportedException because the function call is already in a
transaction so the explicit transaction control is not allowed. I was
comparing this with pl/python and found that the later actually allows
this by creating sub-transactions, which means technically it should be
possible to handle this in pljava but there should be other reasons not
to implement it.
I am willing to implement this feature if there is no philosophical
reason that discourages use of explicit transaction controls in pljava,
or some backend limitation that does not permit these controls without
putting some *hacks*.
Thoughts?
Muhammad Altaf
Fujitsu Australia Software Technology
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.pgfoundry.org/pipermail/pljava-dev/attachments/20131129/996e6e9f/attachment.html>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hal Hildebrand | 2013-11-29 01:18:34 | [Pljava-dev] Explicit transaction control |
Previous Message | John R Pierce | 2013-11-20 22:15:52 | [Pljava-dev] pljava for Postresql 9.3 and Java 7 on 64 bit Windows 7 |