Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A slightly misleading comment in GetNewObjectId()
Date: 2018-08-16 04:47:25
Message-ID: 15606.1534394845@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> That makes it sound like a mere optimisation, but since commit
> 8e18d04d4da user-created objects are not allowed to have OIDs below
> that threshold. So I propose the attached tweak.

+1

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-08-16 05:05:54 Re: docs: note ownership requirement for refreshing materialized views
Previous Message Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery) 2018-08-16 04:36:11 RE: Update comment in errcodes.txt correctly