Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points
Date: 2024-08-20 16:10:08
Message-ID: 1555486.1724170208@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Ugh. The basic issue here is that "make install-world" doesn't
> install anything from underneath src/test/modules, which I recall
> as being an intentional decision. Rather than poking a hole in
> that policy for injection_points, I wonder if we should move it
> to contrib.

... which would also imply writing documentation and so forth,
and it'd mean that injection_points starts to show up in end-user
installations. (That would happen with the alternative choice of
hacking install-world to include src/test/modules/injection_points,
too.) While you could argue that that'd be helpful for extension
authors who'd like to use injection_points in their own tests, I'm
not sure that it's where we want to go with that module. It's only
meant as test scaffolding, and I don't think we've analyzed the
implications of some naive user installing it.

We do, however, need to preserve the property that installcheck
works after install-world. I'm starting to think that maybe
the 041 test should be hacked to silently skip if it doesn't
find injection_points available. (We could then remove some of
the makefile hackery that's supporting the current behavior.)
Probably the same needs to happen in each other test script
that's using injection_points --- I imagine that Maxim's
test is simply failing here first.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2024-08-20 16:23:06 Re: define PG_REPLSLOT_DIR
Previous Message Robert Haas 2024-08-20 16:02:34 Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs