| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table |
| Date: | 2017-08-02 17:58:31 |
| Message-ID: | 15533.1501696711@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> --restore-via-partition-root ?
> I worry someone will think that pg_dump is now restoring stuff, but it isn't.
Well, the point is that the commands it emits will cause the eventual
restore to go through the root. Anyway, I think trying to avoid using
a verb altogether is going to result in a very stilted option name.
I notice that the option list already includes some references to
"insert", so maybe "--insert-via-partition-root"? Although you could
argue that that's confusing when we're using COPY.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-08-02 17:58:38 | Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-08-02 17:57:57 | Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server |