Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2020-07-07 17:53:11
Message-ID: 1531939.1594144391@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Trying to move this along, where would be a good place to define
> OPENSSL_API_COMPAT? The only place that's shared between frontend and
> backend code is c.h. The attached patch does it that way.

pg_config_manual.h, perhaps?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2020-07-07 19:08:38 Re: Question: PostgreSQL on Amazon linux EC2
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-07-07 17:48:00 Re: min_safe_lsn column in pg_replication_slots view