| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] (download ANSI SQL benchmark?) Re: Postgres article |
| Date: | 2000-11-21 15:29:06 |
| Message-ID: | 1518.974820546@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com> writes:
> I thought that Great Bridge's August benchmarks were rather skewed.
> They only used one particular test from the AS3AP suite.
AFAIK there was nothing particularly sinister about that --- they
didn't have time to run a large number of different tests, so they
chose ones that seemed most important. They certainly didn't try
a bunch of tests and then publish only the most favorable; the two
tests used were selected at the beginning of the project, before
anyone knew what the results would look like.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-21 15:40:24 | Re: Trying to build 7.0.3 on SCO 5.0.4 |
| Previous Message | Robert Stachurski | 2000-11-21 15:09:05 | Question about creating functions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-21 15:58:35 | Re: [HACKERS] (download ANSI SQL benchmark?) Re: Postgres article |
| Previous Message | Don Baccus | 2000-11-21 14:33:35 | Re: (download ANSI SQL benchmark?) Re: Postgres article |