From: | Pete Forman <pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: (download ANSI SQL benchmark?) Re: Postgres article |
Date: | 2000-11-21 10:19:53 |
Message-ID: | 14874.19529.912701.409102@kryten.bedford.waii.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus writes:
> I also hope that the PG crew, and Great Bridge, never stoop so low
> as to ship benchmarks wired to "prove" PG's superiority.
I thought that Great Bridge's August benchmarks were rather skewed.
They only used one particular test from the AS3AP suite. That was the
basis for their headline figure of 4-5 times the performance of the
competition.
I was however impressed by the TPC-C results. MySQL and Interbase
were unable to complete them. PostgreSQL showed almost identical
performance over a range of loads to Proprietary 1 (version 8.1.5, on
Linux) and Proprietary 2 (version 7.0, on NT).
--
Pete Forman -./\.- Disclaimer: This post is originated
Western Geophysical -./\.- by myself and does not represent
pete(dot)forman(at)westgeo(dot)com -./\.- the opinion of Baker Hughes or
http://www.crosswinds.net/~petef -./\.- its divisions.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Smith | 2000-11-21 13:27:40 | Trying to build 7.0.3 on SCO 5.0.4 |
Previous Message | DaVinci | 2000-11-21 09:06:10 | Re: Problem creating database |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2000-11-21 13:14:34 | quick english patch |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 2000-11-21 10:05:44 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (xlog.c) |