Re: WARNING: could not flush dirty data: Function not implemented

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Ravi Krishna <sravikrishna(at)aol(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WARNING: could not flush dirty data: Function not implemented
Date: 2018-09-03 13:33:26
Message-ID: 15010.1535981606@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2018-09-02 19:29:49 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If this is on Ubuntu, I don't understand why you're talking
>> about Windows.

> The OP said "Ubuntu 18.04 as Windows bash" - so I assume this is
> postgres compiled as a linux binary is running on MS's new-ish linux
> emulation.

Whee ... so you get to cope with all the bugs/idiosyncrasies of three
operating system layers, not just one. I concur that running Postgres
in the underlying Windows O/S is probably a much better idea.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mate Varga 2018-09-03 13:39:19 Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC
Previous Message Ravi Krishna 2018-09-03 11:59:13 Re: WARNING: could not flush dirty data: Function not implemented