| From: | matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | ivan <ivan(at)420(dot)am>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org | 
| Subject: | re: [lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu: Third call for platform testing] | 
| Date: | 2001-04-05 18:06:36 | 
| Message-ID: | 14983.986493996@splode.eterna.com.au | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
   matthew green <mrg(at)eterna(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
   > digging into the regression.diffs, i can see that:
   > - reltime failed because it just had:
   > ! psql: Backend startup failed
      
   >    The postmaster log file should have more info, but a first thought is
   >    that you ran up against process or swap-space limitations.  The parallel
   >    check has fifty-odd processes going at its peak, which is more than the
   >    default per-user process limit on many Unixen.
   
   > hmm, maxproc=80 on this system currently and i wasn't really doing anything
   > else.  it has 256MB ram and 280MB swap (unused).  exactly what am i looking
   > for in the postmaster.log file?  it is 65kb long...
   
   Look for messages about "fork failed".  They should give a kernel error
   message too.
after running `unlimit' (tcsh) before `make check', the only failures i have
are the horology (expected) and the inherit sorted failures, on NetBSD/sparc64.
i also believe the `Bad address' errors were caused when the test was run in
an NFS mounted directory.
.mrg.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ken Hirsch | 2001-04-05 20:25:42 | Re: Re: TODO list | 
| Previous Message | Bill Studenmund | 2001-04-05 17:33:39 | Test results for postgresql-7.1RC2 on NetBSD/macppc 1.5 |