Re: [Q] optmizing postgres for 'single client' / many small queries

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "V S P" <toreason(at)fastmail(dot)fm>
Cc: "postgres general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Q] optmizing postgres for 'single client' / many small queries
Date: 2009-09-02 18:45:39
Message-ID: 14952.1251917139@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"V S P" <toreason(at)fastmail(dot)fm> writes:
> Well, actually
> somebody has written a C++ ORM
> [ that is causing all your problems and you say you can't discard ]

Just out of curiosity, does anyone know of any ORM anywhere that doesn't
suck? They seem to be uniformly awful, at least in terms of their
interfaces to SQL databases. If there were some we could recommend,
maybe people would be less stuck with these bogus legacy architectures.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message V S P 2009-09-02 19:03:37 Re: [Q] optmizing postgres for 'single client' / many small queries
Previous Message V S P 2009-09-02 18:40:20 Re: [Q] optmizing postgres for 'single client' / many small queries